Grammatical Error Analysis in English Writing Among Tourism Students
A Case Study at Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Mataram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53893/ats.v3i2.55Keywords:
grammatical error, language transfer, interlanguage, tourism educationAbstract
This study investigates the types and sources of grammatical errors found in English essays written by students of Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata (STP) Mataram. Given the contrastive structures between Indonesian (first language) and English (target language), language transfer and interlanguage phenomena are examined as contributing factors. Using a descriptive case study approach, data were collected from 90 student essays, supported by questionnaires and interviews. The analysis identified four primary types of grammatical errors: omission (40 percent), misordering (35 percent), overgeneralization (15 percent), and misinformation (10 percent), with omission emerging as the most frequent. Findings indicate that students often translate directly from Indonesian, leading to syntactic inaccuracies and structural deviations in English. Additionally, several errors reflect interlanguage development, wherein students produce forms that align with neither Indonesian nor standard English. These linguistic patterns highlight the need for targeted pedagogical interventions in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instruction, especially in tourism and hospitality education, where effective written communication is essential. The study underscores the importance of raising students' metalinguistic awareness and integrating contrastive analysis into curriculum design to mitigate persistent grammatical errors.
References
Adalia, H. G., Chavez, J. V., Hayudini, M. A. A., Kinarang, A. J., Sabbaha, N. A., & Salasain, A. A. M. (2025). Relevance of grammar among gen z college students using social learning perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Studies. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8401
Afifah, Komala Dewi, R., & Gustiawan, W. (2025). What Makes a Trip Unforgettable?: Investigating the Role of Memorable Tourism Experiences on Visitor Loyalty in Padang. Global Review of Tourism and Social Sciences, 1(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.53893/grtss.v1i3.396
Alfaifi, A. A. M., & Saleem, M. (2024). Negative transfer and delay in proficiency development: l1 influenced syntax issues faced by arab efl learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6664
Alisoy, H. (2024). Exploring language acquisition: the role of native language interference in ESL learners. Journal of Azerbaijan Language and Education Studies, 1(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.69760/jales.2024.00105
Barone, S., & Саверио, Б. (2024). The importance of interlanguage in language teaching: an analysis of its development in l2 learners. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, 21(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2024.3.6
Esperanza, M. E. B., Espinosa, J. S. F., Gambalosa, F. M., Opalsa, C. M., Tumbagahan, C. M., & Pomentil, R. A. G. (2024). Common informative writing errors among junior high school students: input to lesson exemplars. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(2), 1606–1622. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.2.0466
Kallaba, F. (2025). Grammatical error analysis in academic essays: a comprehensive study of university students in kosovo (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5235157). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5235157
Kusuma Hardi, Y., Nuada, I. W., & Supriyadi, E. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Tourism on the Community’s Economy: A Case Study of Tanjung Menangis Beach in Ketapang Village, East Lombok. Advances in Tourism Studies, 1(1), 37–42. Retrieved from https://pkp.stpmataram.ac.id/index.php/ATS/article/view/11
Mahriyuni, M., Pramuniati, I., & Sitinjak, D. R. (2024). Interlanguage development among the learners of indonesian language in paris. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70394
Murdiansyah. (2024). An error analysis of students’ error using passive sentences in writing explanation text (a case study at eleventh grade student of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Bogor academic year 2023/2024) [bachelorThesis, Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/78877
Namozov, S. (2025). Identifying the importance of grammatical norms in rapid english language learning. Educator Insights: Journal of Teaching Theory and Practice, 1(3), 406-420. https://brightmindpublishing.com/index.php/EI/article/view/290
Norris, S., Hagenbeck, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2021). Linking sustainable business models and supply chains—toward an integrated value creation framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3960–3974. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2851
Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T. K., Siahaan, R. B., & Sitompul, D. S. (2024). Challenges for Indonesian EFL students in english academic writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i2.9780
Picot, A. J. (2025). The design and implementation of a framework for the analysis of lexical errors in the compositions of students of english as a second language [Doctoral, Manchester Metropolitan University]. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/638435/
Setiyorini, T. J., Dewi, P., & Masykuri, E. S. (2020). The grammatical error analysis found in students’ composition. lensa: kajian kebahasaan, kesusastraan, dan budaya, 10(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.10.2.2020.218-233
Toribio, A. J. (2001). Nanda poulisse,slips of the tongue: speech errors in first and second language production (Studies in Bilingualism 20). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999. Pp. xii+266. Journal of Linguistics, 37(2), 393–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670100888X
Zaxidovna, A. F. (2025). The challenges of teaching english grammar to non-native speakers. Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research, 3(1), Retrieved from https://webofjournals.com/index.php/1/article/view/3009
Zhou, L. (2025). The syntactic complexity of ip clauses: a coh-metrix-based comparison between ftas in china and wipo agreements (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5261671). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5261671
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Gede Widya Suputra Widya Suputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.